<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 1219 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106612</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging detention under COFEPOSA, finding no misuse of power, vagueness, or non-application of mind. The petitioner&#039;s claims of non-supply of legible documents and delay in representation disposal were rejected. The court deemed the provided documents readable and the disposal timeframe reasonable, upholding the detention&#039;s validity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:42:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 1219 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106612</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging detention under COFEPOSA, finding no misuse of power, vagueness, or non-application of mind. The petitioner&#039;s claims of non-supply of legible documents and delay in representation disposal were rejected. The court deemed the provided documents readable and the disposal timeframe reasonable, upholding the detention&#039;s validity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>