https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106611 Imported goods found not to conform to the prescribed food standard were excluded from domestic consumption and directed to be re-exported. The additional condition that the importer first prove repatriation of foreign exchange was held unsustainable because it had no basis in the notice or findings and operated as an extra penal burden. Foreign exchange issues were treated as matters for the general law and the appropriate regulatory authority, not as a prerequisite to re-export in customs proceedings. The re-export direction therefore stood without the foreign-exchange condition. en-us Wed, 12 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:41:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106611 Imported goods found not to conform to the prescribed food standard were excluded from domestic consumption and directed to be re-exported. The additional condition that the importer first prove repatriation of foreign exchange was held unsustainable because it had no basis in the notice or findings and operated as an extra penal burden. Foreign exchange issues were treated as matters for the general law and the appropriate regulatory authority, not as a prerequisite to re-export in customs proceedings. The re-export direction therefore stood without the foreign-exchange condition. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 12 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106611