<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 802 - CEGAT,  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106596</link>
    <description>Breach of an import condition prohibiting sale within five years rendered the imported printing machine liable to confiscation under section 111(o), and the purchaser&#039;s lack of knowledge did not defeat that consequence. The appellant&#039;s claimed innocence was, however, relevant to the monetary consequence, so the redemption fine was reduced from Rs. 5 lakhs to Rs. 1.5 lakhs. Confiscation remained undisturbed, while relief was confined to reduction of the fine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:20:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 802 - CEGAT,  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106596</link>
      <description>Breach of an import condition prohibiting sale within five years rendered the imported printing machine liable to confiscation under section 111(o), and the purchaser&#039;s lack of knowledge did not defeat that consequence. The appellant&#039;s claimed innocence was, however, relevant to the monetary consequence, so the redemption fine was reduced from Rs. 5 lakhs to Rs. 1.5 lakhs. Confiscation remained undisturbed, while relief was confined to reduction of the fine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>