<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 1197 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106588</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) order, emphasizing the settled principle of marketability as per the Supreme Court judgment and previous Tribunal decisions. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the impugned order, as the burden of marketability was not discharged by the Department, leading to the rejection of the appeals against the orders-in-original.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:58:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 1197 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106588</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) order, emphasizing the settled principle of marketability as per the Supreme Court judgment and previous Tribunal decisions. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the impugned order, as the burden of marketability was not discharged by the Department, leading to the rejection of the appeals against the orders-in-original.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>