<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 822 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106585</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the maintainability of the winding up petition against the respondent-company. It found that the resolutions authorizing the petition and the actions of Mr. S.L. Jain were valid, despite technical irregularities in signatures and affidavits. The court emphasized the curability of such procedural issues and allowed the petition to proceed before the lower court. The request for a stay of judgment was also denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:53:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 822 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106585</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the maintainability of the winding up petition against the respondent-company. It found that the resolutions authorizing the petition and the actions of Mr. S.L. Jain were valid, despite technical irregularities in signatures and affidavits. The court emphasized the curability of such procedural issues and allowed the petition to proceed before the lower court. The request for a stay of judgment was also denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>