https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106557 A winding up petition was not treated as defective merely because the company was described through its managing director, since the petition, notice and proceedings were clearly directed against the company itself under the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959. Service of statutory notice was also held sufficient where notice was sent to the registered office under the Companies Act, 1956, returned unserved, and then published in newspapers. The company's failure to respond despite repeated opportunities further supported compliance. On these grounds, the winding up order was sustained and the challenge failed. en-us Tue, 04 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:12:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106557 A winding up petition was not treated as defective merely because the company was described through its managing director, since the petition, notice and proceedings were clearly directed against the company itself under the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959. Service of statutory notice was also held sufficient where notice was sent to the registered office under the Companies Act, 1956, returned unserved, and then published in newspapers. The company's failure to respond despite repeated opportunities further supported compliance. On these grounds, the winding up order was sustained and the challenge failed. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 04 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106557