https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106556 An application under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 can be maintained where the agreement contains an arbitration clause and the applicant has otherwise shown an intention to take the dispute to arbitration; prior service of a notice invoking arbitration is not invariably required. However, a contract that is expressly terminable by notice is determinable in nature and is not specifically enforceable under section 14 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. An interim injunction to restrain its termination is therefore barred by section 41(e). The discussed application for interim relief was rejected on that basis, while the applicant was left free to pursue damages in arbitration. en-us Mon, 03 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:10:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106556 An application under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 can be maintained where the agreement contains an arbitration clause and the applicant has otherwise shown an intention to take the dispute to arbitration; prior service of a notice invoking arbitration is not invariably required. However, a contract that is expressly terminable by notice is determinable in nature and is not specifically enforceable under section 14 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. An interim injunction to restrain its termination is therefore barred by section 41(e). The discussed application for interim relief was rejected on that basis, while the applicant was left free to pursue damages in arbitration. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 03 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106556