https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106555 A challenge to execution of a conviction under section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 could not be reopened on the basis of later civil suit interim orders, because those orders did not negate the concluded criminal finding in the absence of any final civil adjudication. The court reiterated that section 362 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 bars a criminal court from reviewing or reopening a final order after it is signed, save for clerical or arithmetical correction. Repeated filings and suppression of earlier adverse orders were treated as abuse of process, and the challenge to the execution orders failed. en-us Sat, 01 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:05:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106555 A challenge to execution of a conviction under section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 could not be reopened on the basis of later civil suit interim orders, because those orders did not negate the concluded criminal finding in the absence of any final civil adjudication. The court reiterated that section 362 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 bars a criminal court from reviewing or reopening a final order after it is signed, save for clerical or arithmetical correction. Repeated filings and suppression of earlier adverse orders were treated as abuse of process, and the challenge to the execution orders failed. Case-Laws Companies Law Sat, 01 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106555