<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 912 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106551</link>
    <description>A scheme of compromise and arrangement under the Companies Act, 1956 was refused because the company did not make a true and correct disclosure of its financial position. The Court found that the balance sheet and supporting statements did not present a reliable picture of liabilities and recoveries, and that the projected sources of payment lacked credibility. Repeated adjournments also supported the view that the proposal was being delayed without a workable foundation. On these facts, the arrangement was held unfair and incapable of implementation, and no direction was made to progress the scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:57:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 912 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106551</link>
      <description>A scheme of compromise and arrangement under the Companies Act, 1956 was refused because the company did not make a true and correct disclosure of its financial position. The Court found that the balance sheet and supporting statements did not present a reliable picture of liabilities and recoveries, and that the projected sources of payment lacked credibility. Repeated adjournments also supported the view that the proposal was being delayed without a workable foundation. On these facts, the arrangement was held unfair and incapable of implementation, and no direction was made to progress the scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>