https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106549 In an investigation under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 applied to the extent the special statute was silent on procedure. The Delhi HC held that Section 160's proviso, which protects a woman from being required to attend at any place other than her residence, governed the interrogation because FERA contained no contrary rule on the place of examination. The summons was for documents and questioning in an ongoing investigation, so the petitioner was entitled to be interrogated at her residence. en-us Thu, 22 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:52:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106549 In an investigation under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 applied to the extent the special statute was silent on procedure. The Delhi HC held that Section 160's proviso, which protects a woman from being required to attend at any place other than her residence, governed the interrogation because FERA contained no contrary rule on the place of examination. The summons was for documents and questioning in an ongoing investigation, so the petitioner was entitled to be interrogated at her residence. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 22 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106549