<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 360 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106537</link>
    <description>Clearances by a 100% Export Oriented Unit into the Domestic Tariff Area were treated as subject to basic excise duty and additional excise duty under the exemption scheme as construed from Notifications No. 55/91 and No. 8/97, as modified by Notification No. 11/2000. The Tribunal noted that the earlier construction of the notifications confined Notification No. 55/91 to exports, while domestic clearances fell within the scope of the duty provisions. Reliance on the Board circular and the unit&#039;s sick-company status did not alter the liability. The exemption claim was rejected and the domestic clearances were treated as dutiable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:22:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 360 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106537</link>
      <description>Clearances by a 100% Export Oriented Unit into the Domestic Tariff Area were treated as subject to basic excise duty and additional excise duty under the exemption scheme as construed from Notifications No. 55/91 and No. 8/97, as modified by Notification No. 11/2000. The Tribunal noted that the earlier construction of the notifications confined Notification No. 55/91 to exports, while domestic clearances fell within the scope of the duty provisions. Reliance on the Board circular and the unit&#039;s sick-company status did not alter the liability. The exemption claim was rejected and the domestic clearances were treated as dutiable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>