<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 442 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106531</link>
    <description>The applicants established a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in an appeal concerning anti-dumping duty on hard ring ferrite magnets. The record indicated that the imported goods were unmagnetized and did not clearly fall within the earlier notification referring only to &quot;Hard Ferrite Magnets&quot;; the later notification expressly covered hard ring ferrite magnets, including in unmagnetized form, and its possible clarificatory effect was left for final hearing. On that basis, a prima facie case was also found against the separate penalties imposed on the proprietary concerns, and recovery of both duty and penalties was stayed during pendency of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:17:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 442 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106531</link>
      <description>The applicants established a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in an appeal concerning anti-dumping duty on hard ring ferrite magnets. The record indicated that the imported goods were unmagnetized and did not clearly fall within the earlier notification referring only to &quot;Hard Ferrite Magnets&quot;; the later notification expressly covered hard ring ferrite magnets, including in unmagnetized form, and its possible clarificatory effect was left for final hearing. On that basis, a prima facie case was also found against the separate penalties imposed on the proprietary concerns, and recovery of both duty and penalties was stayed during pendency of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>