<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 440 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106529</link>
    <description>Excisable molasses permitted for storage in kutcha pits were treated as duty-paid goods because duty had to be paid first at the rate applicable on the date of removal. A later refund claim failed where the assessee had not sought provisional assessment, had not challenged the condition requiring prepayment, and could not recast a final duty payment as a provisional deposit through later correspondence. The fact that the goods were subsequently sold at a lower price did not create a refundable entitlement, and rules governing storage without payment of duty were inapplicable because the goods were not stored under bond.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:15:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 440 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106529</link>
      <description>Excisable molasses permitted for storage in kutcha pits were treated as duty-paid goods because duty had to be paid first at the rate applicable on the date of removal. A later refund claim failed where the assessee had not sought provisional assessment, had not challenged the condition requiring prepayment, and could not recast a final duty payment as a provisional deposit through later correspondence. The fact that the goods were subsequently sold at a lower price did not create a refundable entitlement, and rules governing storage without payment of duty were inapplicable because the goods were not stored under bond.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>