<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 436 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106524</link>
    <description>A prima facie time-bar under Section 11A and a weak excisability case justified full waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery. The applicants challenged a duty demand on waste and scrap cleared over a long period, contending that much of it fell outside the normal limitation period. They also argued that the show-cause allegation of suppression rested on non-declaration of paper waste/broke, while the adjudication proceeded on a different basis. On merits, they maintained that waste and scrap arising from dismantling machinery was not excisable scrap. The record was found to disclose a strong prima facie case on both limitation and merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:55:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 436 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106524</link>
      <description>A prima facie time-bar under Section 11A and a weak excisability case justified full waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery. The applicants challenged a duty demand on waste and scrap cleared over a long period, contending that much of it fell outside the normal limitation period. They also argued that the show-cause allegation of suppression rested on non-declaration of paper waste/broke, while the adjudication proceeded on a different basis. On merits, they maintained that waste and scrap arising from dismantling machinery was not excisable scrap. The record was found to disclose a strong prima facie case on both limitation and merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>