<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 571 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106511</link>
    <description>Capital goods manufactured by an assessee during setting up of a cement plant and used within the same premises were treated as eligible for exemption under Notification No. 67/95-C.E. The applicable test was whether the premises qualified as a &quot;factory&quot; under Section 2(e) of the Central Excise Act; once excisable goods were being manufactured there, that requirement was satisfied. Because the goods were manufactured and used within the same factory premises, the notification conditions were met. The interpretation was also consistent with the assessee&#039;s earlier case, and the denial of exemption was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:28:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 571 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106511</link>
      <description>Capital goods manufactured by an assessee during setting up of a cement plant and used within the same premises were treated as eligible for exemption under Notification No. 67/95-C.E. The applicable test was whether the premises qualified as a &quot;factory&quot; under Section 2(e) of the Central Excise Act; once excisable goods were being manufactured there, that requirement was satisfied. Because the goods were manufactured and used within the same factory premises, the notification conditions were met. The interpretation was also consistent with the assessee&#039;s earlier case, and the denial of exemption was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106511</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>