<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 560 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106492</link>
    <description>Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 was considered on the question whether &quot;officer or employee&quot; covers only the employee and legal heirs, or also other family members in possession of company property. An apparent conflict in earlier Supreme Court decisions on the statutory interpretation was identified, and the matter was referred to a Larger Bench for authoritative determination. No final ruling on the scope of the provision was rendered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 18:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 560 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106492</link>
      <description>Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 was considered on the question whether &quot;officer or employee&quot; covers only the employee and legal heirs, or also other family members in possession of company property. An apparent conflict in earlier Supreme Court decisions on the statutory interpretation was identified, and the matter was referred to a Larger Bench for authoritative determination. No final ruling on the scope of the provision was rendered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>