https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106487 Where an efficacious statutory remedy is available, writ jurisdiction will ordinarily not be invoked to challenge omission of requisitioned items from an extraordinary general meeting agenda. The court noted that the requisitionists were not excluded from the scope of the Companies Act provisions, but the respondents had explained the omission on the basis that some matters had already been acted upon, some fell within the council's domain, and others involved government policy. As the grievance could be pursued through statutory and administrative remedies and part of the dispute concerned policy matters, interference to compel inclusion of the items was not warranted. en-us Tue, 27 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:08:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106487 Where an efficacious statutory remedy is available, writ jurisdiction will ordinarily not be invoked to challenge omission of requisitioned items from an extraordinary general meeting agenda. The court noted that the requisitionists were not excluded from the scope of the Companies Act provisions, but the respondents had explained the omission on the basis that some matters had already been acted upon, some fell within the council's domain, and others involved government policy. As the grievance could be pursued through statutory and administrative remedies and part of the dispute concerned policy matters, interference to compel inclusion of the items was not warranted. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 27 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106487