<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 618 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106485</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeals and company petitions, affirming the Single Judge&#039;s decision. It clarified that disputed debts do not warrant a winding-up order, advising parties to seek remedies through civil courts. The judgment emphasized the need for establishing prima facie admitted debts for winding-up orders and reiterated that disputed debts should be resolved in civil courts, not through winding-up petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:07:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 618 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106485</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeals and company petitions, affirming the Single Judge&#039;s decision. It clarified that disputed debts do not warrant a winding-up order, advising parties to seek remedies through civil courts. The judgment emphasized the need for establishing prima facie admitted debts for winding-up orders and reiterated that disputed debts should be resolved in civil courts, not through winding-up petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>