<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 558 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106464</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the impugned judgment and required the assessees to pursue their statutory appeals before the first appellate authority. The appellate authority was directed to decide the appeals on merits and independently of the High Court&#039;s observations, ensuring that the statutory remedy was considered in the ordinary course without any prejudgment from the earlier order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 18:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 558 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106464</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the impugned judgment and required the assessees to pursue their statutory appeals before the first appellate authority. The appellate authority was directed to decide the appeals on merits and independently of the High Court&#039;s observations, ensuring that the statutory remedy was considered in the ordinary course without any prejudgment from the earlier order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>