<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 626 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106461</link>
    <description>Central excise duty cannot be demanded solely from shortage of raw material unless there is independent evidence of actual clandestine manufacture and removal of the finished goods. Here, only a shortfall in molasses was established; there was no shortage of finished product, no admission by any responsible functionary, and no material showing that the raw material deficiency was converted into denatured ethyl alcohol and cleared without duty. The inference of clandestine production was therefore arbitrary and subjective. Proceedings could at most relate to the raw material shortage itself, but the duty demand and penalty based on a hypothetical assumption of manufacture and clearance were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:23:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143489" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 626 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106461</link>
      <description>Central excise duty cannot be demanded solely from shortage of raw material unless there is independent evidence of actual clandestine manufacture and removal of the finished goods. Here, only a shortfall in molasses was established; there was no shortage of finished product, no admission by any responsible functionary, and no material showing that the raw material deficiency was converted into denatured ethyl alcohol and cleared without duty. The inference of clandestine production was therefore arbitrary and subjective. Proceedings could at most relate to the raw material shortage itself, but the duty demand and penalty based on a hypothetical assumption of manufacture and clearance were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>