<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 622 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106455</link>
    <description>Wooden boxes or crates used solely to protect sheet glass during transport are not normal packing where the goods are also sold at the factory gate without such packing. Their use for safe transit, rather than as a condition of marketable supply, excludes the packing cost from the assessable value for central excise duty. The factual premise that Modvat credit had been taken on the wooden packing was unsupported and did not justify inclusion of its cost.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:13:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 622 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106455</link>
      <description>Wooden boxes or crates used solely to protect sheet glass during transport are not normal packing where the goods are also sold at the factory gate without such packing. Their use for safe transit, rather than as a condition of marketable supply, excludes the packing cost from the assessable value for central excise duty. The factual premise that Modvat credit had been taken on the wooden packing was unsupported and did not justify inclusion of its cost.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106455</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>