<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 589 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106448</link>
    <description>The court held that the former directors of RBF Nidhi were not liable for dishonored cheques issued after their removal by the Company Law Board. The court emphasized that the offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act occurred after their removal, absolving them of responsibility. It was ruled that the Company Law Board&#039;s order could not retroactively affect liabilities for cheques issued before the order. Consequently, the complaints against the petitioners were quashed, as they were not directors at the time of the offense.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:02:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 589 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106448</link>
      <description>The court held that the former directors of RBF Nidhi were not liable for dishonored cheques issued after their removal by the Company Law Board. The court emphasized that the offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act occurred after their removal, absolving them of responsibility. It was ruled that the Company Law Board&#039;s order could not retroactively affect liabilities for cheques issued before the order. Consequently, the complaints against the petitioners were quashed, as they were not directors at the time of the offense.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>