<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 586 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106446</link>
    <description>A claim for unpaid professional fees against a company in liquidation was held not maintainable because the application was brought long after liquidation and no provision was shown to sustain it in the pending company matter. The fee arrangement envisaged payment in two stages, part payment had already been made, and liquidation did not create any basis to compel payment of the balance. The argument that the unpaid amount should be treated as costs in the winding-up proceedings was also rejected in the absence of supporting legal provision, so no relief for the balance fees could be granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:00:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143477" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 586 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106446</link>
      <description>A claim for unpaid professional fees against a company in liquidation was held not maintainable because the application was brought long after liquidation and no provision was shown to sustain it in the pending company matter. The fee arrangement envisaged payment in two stages, part payment had already been made, and liquidation did not create any basis to compel payment of the balance. The argument that the unpaid amount should be treated as costs in the winding-up proceedings was also rejected in the absence of supporting legal provision, so no relief for the balance fees could be granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>