https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106438 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's judgment. It held that the bid terms were ambiguous regarding the inclusion of sales tax, emphasizing the importance of clarity to avoid ambiguity. The Court upheld the interpretation favoring the party responsible for payment, citing the limited scope of judicial review in administrative matters and the need for restraint in interfering with administrative decisions unless they are unreasonable or illegal. en-us Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106438 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's judgment. It held that the bid terms were ambiguous regarding the inclusion of sales tax, emphasizing the importance of clarity to avoid ambiguity. The Court upheld the interpretation favoring the party responsible for payment, citing the limited scope of judicial review in administrative matters and the need for restraint in interfering with administrative decisions unless they are unreasonable or illegal. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106438