https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106431 Section 402 relief in oppression and mismanagement proceedings cannot be used to introduce a fresh, independent monetary claim unconnected with the original dispute. The Delhi High Court held that an application seeking deposit of licence fee for premises allegedly occupied by non-parties was not maintainable because the claim arose outside the original controversy over control and management of the company; that application was dismissed with costs. Separately, the Court allowed the applications for condonation of delay and amendment in the pending matter, granting procedural relief while rejecting the substantive ancillary claim. en-us Mon, 12 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:37:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106431 Section 402 relief in oppression and mismanagement proceedings cannot be used to introduce a fresh, independent monetary claim unconnected with the original dispute. The Delhi High Court held that an application seeking deposit of licence fee for premises allegedly occupied by non-parties was not maintainable because the claim arose outside the original controversy over control and management of the company; that application was dismissed with costs. Separately, the Court allowed the applications for condonation of delay and amendment in the pending matter, granting procedural relief while rejecting the substantive ancillary claim. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 12 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106431