<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 570 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106423</link>
    <description>A writ petition sought mandamus for expeditious consideration of a complaint before the stock exchange. The HC disposed of the petition with directions to process and finalise the complaint within the stated time, furnish a copy of the report to the petitioner, and take further steps after completion of the substitution proceedings. The operative effect was to require prompt administrative action on the complaint and ensure disclosure of the resulting report to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:23:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 570 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106423</link>
      <description>A writ petition sought mandamus for expeditious consideration of a complaint before the stock exchange. The HC disposed of the petition with directions to process and finalise the complaint within the stated time, furnish a copy of the report to the petitioner, and take further steps after completion of the substitution proceedings. The operative effect was to require prompt administrative action on the complaint and ensure disclosure of the resulting report to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>