<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (6) TMI 492 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106416</link>
    <description>Packing cost was excludible from assessable value where the packing was durable and returnable by the buyer. The record showed that the goods were cleared in wooden crates under an arrangement for return of the crates, and the fact that some planks had to be dismantled to remove the glass sheets did not by itself destroy the durable character of the packing. The crates remained capable of further use as packing material, so the cost of the wooden packing was deductible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:08:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (6) TMI 492 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106416</link>
      <description>Packing cost was excludible from assessable value where the packing was durable and returnable by the buyer. The record showed that the goods were cleared in wooden crates under an arrangement for return of the crates, and the fact that some planks had to be dismantled to remove the glass sheets did not by itself destroy the durable character of the packing. The crates remained capable of further use as packing material, so the cost of the wooden packing was deductible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106416</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>