<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (6) TMI 487 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106409</link>
    <description>Petroleum storage tanks fabricated in situ were examined on the twin tests of movability and marketability for excise duty. The Tribunal treated the dispute as covered by earlier decisions on the same ratio and held that tanks fabricated at site did not satisfy those requirements on the facts presented. They were therefore not regarded as excisable goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:44:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (6) TMI 487 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106409</link>
      <description>Petroleum storage tanks fabricated in situ were examined on the twin tests of movability and marketability for excise duty. The Tribunal treated the dispute as covered by earlier decisions on the same ratio and held that tanks fabricated at site did not satisfy those requirements on the facts presented. They were therefore not regarded as excisable goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>