https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106402 Compulsory winding up discharges employees under section 445(3) of the Companies Act, 1956, so industrial dispute remedies could not be used in the company court to resist vacation of staff quarters. Claims founded on the Industrial Disputes Act had to be pursued before the appropriate forum, not as a defence to eviction. Once winding up commenced, company assets came under the court's control, and the court could direct surrender of property to the official liquidator under the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959. The official liquidator was therefore entitled to secure eviction and recover possession of the quarters. en-us Wed, 24 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:32:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106402 Compulsory winding up discharges employees under section 445(3) of the Companies Act, 1956, so industrial dispute remedies could not be used in the company court to resist vacation of staff quarters. Claims founded on the Industrial Disputes Act had to be pursued before the appropriate forum, not as a defence to eviction. Once winding up commenced, company assets came under the court's control, and the court could direct surrender of property to the official liquidator under the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959. The official liquidator was therefore entitled to secure eviction and recover possession of the quarters. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 24 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106402