<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 516 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106397</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the retrospective application of sub-section (2B) of section 9 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, and validated its operation through section 120 of the Finance Act, 2000. The Court emphasized the compensatory nature of the interest for delayed payment and dismissed the civil appeals without costs, as the constitutional validity of the provision was not challenged by the parties involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 516 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106397</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the retrospective application of sub-section (2B) of section 9 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, and validated its operation through section 120 of the Finance Act, 2000. The Court emphasized the compensatory nature of the interest for delayed payment and dismissed the civil appeals without costs, as the constitutional validity of the provision was not challenged by the parties involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>