<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 433 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106386</link>
    <description>The controversy concerned a mid-year enhancement of the compounded tax rate under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 and the attempted rectification of an earlier permission order under section 43. The Court noted that the matter required examination of the statutory scheme governing normal assessment under section 5, alternate compounded taxation under section 7, and the effect of rule 30 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Rules, 1963. It also observed that the Division Bench had disposed of the issue without fully analysing whether the amended rate could operate within the assessment year and whether rectification was available within the alternate taxation framework. The impugned judgment was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 433 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106386</link>
      <description>The controversy concerned a mid-year enhancement of the compounded tax rate under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 and the attempted rectification of an earlier permission order under section 43. The Court noted that the matter required examination of the statutory scheme governing normal assessment under section 5, alternate compounded taxation under section 7, and the effect of rule 30 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Rules, 1963. It also observed that the Division Bench had disposed of the issue without fully analysing whether the amended rate could operate within the assessment year and whether rectification was available within the alternate taxation framework. The impugned judgment was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>