https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106385 A writ court will ordinarily not entertain a challenge seeking rectification of a company's register of members where the Companies Act, 1956 provides a specific statutory remedy for transfer-related grievances. The availability of that forum, especially after the petitioner had already invoked and withdrawn proceedings there, made writ jurisdiction inappropriate. Relief was also refused because the dispute arose from a private share-transfer arrangement, involved contested factual and contractual questions, and was brought after substantial delay and laches. In such circumstances, discretionary relief under Article 226 is not granted, and the challenge is treated as unsuitable for writ adjudication. en-us Tue, 16 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Mar 2012 18:34:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106385 A writ court will ordinarily not entertain a challenge seeking rectification of a company's register of members where the Companies Act, 1956 provides a specific statutory remedy for transfer-related grievances. The availability of that forum, especially after the petitioner had already invoked and withdrawn proceedings there, made writ jurisdiction inappropriate. Relief was also refused because the dispute arose from a private share-transfer arrangement, involved contested factual and contractual questions, and was brought after substantial delay and laches. In such circumstances, discretionary relief under Article 226 is not granted, and the challenge is treated as unsuitable for writ adjudication. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 16 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106385