https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106372 Exchange bye-laws were treated as supplying the arbitration framework where transactions by a member with a non-member were made subject to the exchange's rules and disputes arising from those dealings were expressly referable to arbitration. The court also noted that the final appellate award under that scheme carried the prescribed consequence for non-deposit of the directed amount, and no illegality or infirmity was shown in refusing interference. The doctrine of merger applied, so the earlier award could not be revived against the final appellate award. The challenge failed on both the procedural objection and the jurisdictional objection. en-us Mon, 24 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Mar 2012 18:14:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106372 Exchange bye-laws were treated as supplying the arbitration framework where transactions by a member with a non-member were made subject to the exchange's rules and disputes arising from those dealings were expressly referable to arbitration. The court also noted that the final appellate award under that scheme carried the prescribed consequence for non-deposit of the directed amount, and no illegality or infirmity was shown in refusing interference. The doctrine of merger applied, so the earlier award could not be revived against the final appellate award. The challenge failed on both the procedural objection and the jurisdictional objection. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 24 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106372