<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (6) TMI 454 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106371</link>
    <description>The court dismissed objections regarding the share exchange ratio, compliance with the Companies Act, validity of proxies, directors&#039; interest in the merger, financial impact on shareholders, and disclosure of legal proceedings. It found the merger scheme fair, just, and in compliance with statutory requirements. The court sanctioned the amalgamation, ordering dissolution of the transferor-company without winding up. Petitioner-companies were permitted to seek further directions during scheme implementation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 18:12:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (6) TMI 454 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106371</link>
      <description>The court dismissed objections regarding the share exchange ratio, compliance with the Companies Act, validity of proxies, directors&#039; interest in the merger, financial impact on shareholders, and disclosure of legal proceedings. It found the merger scheme fair, just, and in compliance with statutory requirements. The court sanctioned the amalgamation, ordering dissolution of the transferor-company without winding up. Petitioner-companies were permitted to seek further directions during scheme implementation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>