<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 740 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106368</link>
    <description>Declared invoice value may be rejected where the importer fails to prove the truth of the transaction value or produce reliable supporting documents; comparable imports of the same model can then be used to enhance valuation, and minor time gaps or sub-model variations will not necessarily defeat comparability. The customs authorities may also sustain confiscation, redemption fine and penalties where the facts show deliberate undervaluation and a real importer operating behind the declared importer. A plea based on provisional assessment does not protect a deliberate misdeclaration intended to evade duty. On these facts, the enhanced valuation and punitive measures were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 18:04:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 740 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106368</link>
      <description>Declared invoice value may be rejected where the importer fails to prove the truth of the transaction value or produce reliable supporting documents; comparable imports of the same model can then be used to enhance valuation, and minor time gaps or sub-model variations will not necessarily defeat comparability. The customs authorities may also sustain confiscation, redemption fine and penalties where the facts show deliberate undervaluation and a real importer operating behind the declared importer. A plea based on provisional assessment does not protect a deliberate misdeclaration intended to evade duty. On these facts, the enhanced valuation and punitive measures were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>