<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (6) TMI 444 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106360</link>
    <description>Dividend warrants posted to shareholders&#039; registered addresses within the statutory period constitute payment for Section 205A of the Companies Act, 1956. Failure to transfer amounts to the unpaid-dividend special account attracts liability only where dividends remain unpaid or unclaimed in the statutory sense; depositing the amount in the bank and timely posting of warrants did not disclose such an offence. A fine-only offence is subject to the six-month limitation period under Section 468 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The prosecution was instituted after that period and could not be extended on the stated facts, so the proceedings were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 17:57:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (6) TMI 444 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106360</link>
      <description>Dividend warrants posted to shareholders&#039; registered addresses within the statutory period constitute payment for Section 205A of the Companies Act, 1956. Failure to transfer amounts to the unpaid-dividend special account attracts liability only where dividends remain unpaid or unclaimed in the statutory sense; depositing the amount in the bank and timely posting of warrants did not disclose such an offence. A fine-only offence is subject to the six-month limitation period under Section 468 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The prosecution was instituted after that period and could not be extended on the stated facts, so the proceedings were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>