https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106347 The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 operates as a self-contained code for interim relief before an arbitral tribunal. An order refusing interim relief under section 17 is appealable under section 37, so the writ jurisdiction under article 226 should not be invoked before that statutory remedy is exhausted. The Delhi High Court therefore treated the alternative appellate remedy as an effective bar to the writ petition, and the challenge to the arbitral order failed. en-us Thu, 30 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Mar 2012 17:36:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106347 The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 operates as a self-contained code for interim relief before an arbitral tribunal. An order refusing interim relief under section 17 is appealable under section 37, so the writ jurisdiction under article 226 should not be invoked before that statutory remedy is exhausted. The Delhi High Court therefore treated the alternative appellate remedy as an effective bar to the writ petition, and the challenge to the arbitral order failed. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 30 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106347