<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 224 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106330</link>
    <description>Modvat credit could not be denied merely because the inputs were supported by cash memos issued by a public sector undertaking, where receipt of duty-paid inputs and their use in manufacture were undisputed. The Tribunal treated such documents as acceptable and held that a technical objection to the form of documentation could not defeat substantive entitlement to credit. Credit was therefore admissible and the revenue appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:56:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 224 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106330</link>
      <description>Modvat credit could not be denied merely because the inputs were supported by cash memos issued by a public sector undertaking, where receipt of duty-paid inputs and their use in manufacture were undisputed. The Tribunal treated such documents as acceptable and held that a technical objection to the form of documentation could not defeat substantive entitlement to credit. Credit was therefore admissible and the revenue appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>