<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 707 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106329</link>
    <description>The appellant was found in possession of smuggled gold bars and admitted to dealing with such activities for months. Despite his retraction, investigations confirmed the voluntariness of his statement. The tribunal upheld the penalty imposed by the adjudicating authority, considering the circumstances and the appellant&#039;s involvement in smuggling. The penalty was deemed reasonable, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:45:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 707 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106329</link>
      <description>The appellant was found in possession of smuggled gold bars and admitted to dealing with such activities for months. Despite his retraction, investigations confirmed the voluntariness of his statement. The tribunal upheld the penalty imposed by the adjudicating authority, considering the circumstances and the appellant&#039;s involvement in smuggling. The penalty was deemed reasonable, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>