https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106323 A broad arbitration clause covering disputes arising out of or in relation to the agreement was construed by looking at the substance of the claim, not technical objections. On that approach, the claim for reimbursement of plant loss and related interest was treated as within the arbitration reference, so the arbitrators had jurisdiction to decide it. The Civil Judge's discretionary remission of the award under section 16(1)(c) of the Arbitration Act, 1940 was also upheld because an apparent legal error and failure to consider relevant material justified remission rather than setting aside the award. The appellate interference was therefore not sustained, and the remission order was restored. en-us Tue, 07 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106323 A broad arbitration clause covering disputes arising out of or in relation to the agreement was construed by looking at the substance of the claim, not technical objections. On that approach, the claim for reimbursement of plant loss and related interest was treated as within the arbitration reference, so the arbitrators had jurisdiction to decide it. The Civil Judge's discretionary remission of the award under section 16(1)(c) of the Arbitration Act, 1940 was also upheld because an apparent legal error and failure to consider relevant material justified remission rather than setting aside the award. The appellate interference was therefore not sustained, and the remission order was restored. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 07 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106323