<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 428 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106318</link>
    <description>SC affirmed that the revenue and HC factually found the items sold were complete wet grinders (new commodities) not merely parts, so tax levy stands and no interference is warranted. Regarding penalty, the SC held that where items excluded from turnover were nevertheless disclosed in the dealer&#039;s own books and then included by assessing authorities, penalty cannot be imposed; the penalty was set aside. Appeals disposed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 15:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 428 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106318</link>
      <description>SC affirmed that the revenue and HC factually found the items sold were complete wet grinders (new commodities) not merely parts, so tax levy stands and no interference is warranted. Regarding penalty, the SC held that where items excluded from turnover were nevertheless disclosed in the dealer&#039;s own books and then included by assessing authorities, penalty cannot be imposed; the penalty was set aside. Appeals disposed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>