<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 694 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106316</link>
    <description>The statutory takeover framework imposed an obligation to make a public announcement on substantial acquisition of shares, and the challenge was confined to the direction enforcing that requirement. The appellants did not effectively dispute the existence of the obligation, and the High Court found no error or perversity in the Securities Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order sustaining SEBI&#039;s direction. The enforcement direction was therefore upheld, and the appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:29:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 694 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106316</link>
      <description>The statutory takeover framework imposed an obligation to make a public announcement on substantial acquisition of shares, and the challenge was confined to the direction enforcing that requirement. The appellants did not effectively dispute the existence of the obligation, and the High Court found no error or perversity in the Securities Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order sustaining SEBI&#039;s direction. The enforcement direction was therefore upheld, and the appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>