<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 797 - DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106297</link>
    <description>The State Commission upheld the District Forum&#039;s decision in an appeal under section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, concerning non-receipt of dividends, bonus shares, and excess amount refund. The Commission determined that the redressal agencies are not meant to resolve complex factual issues and advised the appellant to pursue the matter in a Civil Court due to the intricate nature of share transfers and ownership disputes. The appeal was dismissed without costs, emphasizing the limited jurisdiction of redressal agencies in handling intricate factual disputes beyond their scope.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:00:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 797 - DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106297</link>
      <description>The State Commission upheld the District Forum&#039;s decision in an appeal under section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, concerning non-receipt of dividends, bonus shares, and excess amount refund. The Commission determined that the redressal agencies are not meant to resolve complex factual issues and advised the appellant to pursue the matter in a Civil Court due to the intricate nature of share transfers and ownership disputes. The appeal was dismissed without costs, emphasizing the limited jurisdiction of redressal agencies in handling intricate factual disputes beyond their scope.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>