<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 674 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106295</link>
    <description>Duty demand and penalty arising from molasses shortage were unsustainable where the variation was 1.86%, within the permissible limit recognised by the Board, and the shortage was explained by storage-related natural factors such as foam, air bubbles, and temperature-driven changes in density and volume. In the absence of material indicating clandestine removal, the alleged shortage could not justify duty liability. The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:55:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 674 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106295</link>
      <description>Duty demand and penalty arising from molasses shortage were unsustainable where the variation was 1.86%, within the permissible limit recognised by the Board, and the shortage was explained by storage-related natural factors such as foam, air bubbles, and temperature-driven changes in density and volume. In the absence of material indicating clandestine removal, the alleged shortage could not justify duty liability. The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>