https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106288 An appeal does not lie from an order of the Company Law Board passed on an application under section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, because the Act is a self-contained and exhaustive code for matters covered by Part I. Section 5 limits judicial intervention to what the Act permits, and section 37 provides an exhaustive list of appealable orders, with the words "and from no others" excluding any further appeal. The Court also held that an attachment rule cannot create a right of appeal where the governing statute expressly or impliedly excludes it. en-us Wed, 24 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:42:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106288 An appeal does not lie from an order of the Company Law Board passed on an application under section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, because the Act is a self-contained and exhaustive code for matters covered by Part I. Section 5 limits judicial intervention to what the Act permits, and section 37 provides an exhaustive list of appealable orders, with the words "and from no others" excluding any further appeal. The Court also held that an attachment rule cannot create a right of appeal where the governing statute expressly or impliedly excludes it. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 24 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106288