<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 663 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106283</link>
    <description>Non-filing of a declaration under Rule 57Q was treated as a technical lapse and not a ground to deny Modvat credit where the duty-paid character of the goods was undisputed and the items otherwise satisfied the conditions for capital goods eligibility. The listed items were therefore held eligible for Modvat credit, and denial of credit solely for want of declaration was not justified. Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:31:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 663 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106283</link>
      <description>Non-filing of a declaration under Rule 57Q was treated as a technical lapse and not a ground to deny Modvat credit where the duty-paid character of the goods was undisputed and the items otherwise satisfied the conditions for capital goods eligibility. The listed items were therefore held eligible for Modvat credit, and denial of credit solely for want of declaration was not justified. Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>