<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 777 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106273</link>
    <description>Deemed Modvat credit could not be granted on the basis of fresh material taken for the first time at the lower appellate stage without giving the department an opportunity to respond. Where there was a factual dispute on whether the input manufacturer had discharged the duty liability, the appellate authority could not rely on the jurisdictional Range Officer&#039;s certificate without further examination. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication by the original authority on entitlement to deemed Modvat credit, including whether the input manufacturer had duly discharged the duty liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:06:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143307" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 777 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106273</link>
      <description>Deemed Modvat credit could not be granted on the basis of fresh material taken for the first time at the lower appellate stage without giving the department an opportunity to respond. Where there was a factual dispute on whether the input manufacturer had discharged the duty liability, the appellate authority could not rely on the jurisdictional Range Officer&#039;s certificate without further examination. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication by the original authority on entitlement to deemed Modvat credit, including whether the input manufacturer had duly discharged the duty liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>