<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 772 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106267</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the redemption fine and penalty imposed by the Commissioner, emphasizing that penalties should not be imposed when a valid import license is produced before the clearance of goods. The matter was remanded for de novo consideration of valuation, providing the importer with an opportunity to contest the assessment. The Tribunal highlighted the need for a fair and just assessment process, ensuring the importer&#039;s right to challenge the valuation of goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:56:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 772 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106267</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the redemption fine and penalty imposed by the Commissioner, emphasizing that penalties should not be imposed when a valid import license is produced before the clearance of goods. The matter was remanded for de novo consideration of valuation, providing the importer with an opportunity to contest the assessment. The Tribunal highlighted the need for a fair and just assessment process, ensuring the importer&#039;s right to challenge the valuation of goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>