<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (11) TMI 362 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106238</link>
    <description>Section 633(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 is available only where an officer reasonably apprehends that proceedings may be brought against him; once a complaint has been filed and process issued before the magistrate, proceedings have already commenced and the High Court&#039;s jurisdiction under section 633(2) is no longer available. Relief after initiation of prosecution must be sought before the court trying the matter under section 633(1), subject to the statutory requirements of honesty, reasonableness and fairness. An objection based on delay in filing the complaint did not change the fact that proceedings were pending, so the petition was held not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:24:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (11) TMI 362 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106238</link>
      <description>Section 633(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 is available only where an officer reasonably apprehends that proceedings may be brought against him; once a complaint has been filed and process issued before the magistrate, proceedings have already commenced and the High Court&#039;s jurisdiction under section 633(2) is no longer available. Relief after initiation of prosecution must be sought before the court trying the matter under section 633(1), subject to the statutory requirements of honesty, reasonableness and fairness. An objection based on delay in filing the complaint did not change the fact that proceedings were pending, so the petition was held not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>