<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (9) TMI 313 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106235</link>
    <description>A written hire purchase agreement containing an arbitration clause was treated as sufficient for reference where the court found a valid and subsisting arbitration agreement and an existing dispute within its scope. Questions such as whether consideration had passed were held to concern the merits and were left to the arbitrator. The company&#039;s objection that the agreement was unauthorised and unsupported by a valid board resolution also failed, because it produced no resolution book or minutes and led no satisfactory evidence to disprove authority. An adverse inference was drawn from non-production of company records, and the reference order was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:20:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (9) TMI 313 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106235</link>
      <description>A written hire purchase agreement containing an arbitration clause was treated as sufficient for reference where the court found a valid and subsisting arbitration agreement and an existing dispute within its scope. Questions such as whether consideration had passed were held to concern the merits and were left to the arbitrator. The company&#039;s objection that the agreement was unauthorised and unsupported by a valid board resolution also failed, because it produced no resolution book or minutes and led no satisfactory evidence to disprove authority. An adverse inference was drawn from non-production of company records, and the reference order was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>